A dry-types/dry-struct alternative making the difference between undefined and nil

DRY your RubyMotion project

A rails asset gem for dry-observer

Validate graphql-ruby arguments easily with dry-validation

You've DRYed up your controllers. Now DRY up your controller specs.

Why does a squirrel swim on its back? To keep its nuts dry

Adds a 'rake' method to Rack's Builder DSL, allowing you to execute Rake tasks when configuring your Rack application. This helps to keep your code DRY.

Rails RESTful controller abstraction plugin, with cascading views to keep them nice and DRY.

Keep your tests DRY. This makes some methods available to avoid repeating yourself during testing

web_pipe integration for dry-web apps

DRY, SEO-friendly Rails Views

An extension to hash to allow various transformations using simple DSL. Also has optional rails extension to dry up frequently applied transformations on controller params.

Invoke methods DRY and safely with parameterized retries, timeouts and logging

FrontCompiler is a Ruby based JavaScript/CSS/HTML compressor. It provides the basic JavaScript/CSS/HTML minifying feature. Plus it can create albeit packed JavaScript files, can inline CSS inside of JavaScript, works with DRYed CSS files and also can work as a RubyOnRails plugin.

A light attributes wrapper for dry-initializer. Forked from "https://github.com/goldstar/artisanal-model"

Kybus::Core will be used across all the kybus gems. Provides the most basic functionality or what might be used along with more than one gem. Currently this only exposes the basic exceptions and the DRY patterns.

This gem allows similar ActiveRecord validates_* commands to be grouped together in blocks and pruned of repeated parameters. How often have you had a block of validation commands in an ActiveRecord object that are repeated, especially :id or :unless options? Does this look familiar? validates_presence_of :hair, :hair_color, :unless => :bald? validates_length_of :hair, :within => 3..15, :unless => :bald? validates_inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS, :unless => bald? Instead, this gem will allow you to replace the above code with: validate_block :unless => :bald? do presence_of :hair, :hair_color length_of :hair, :within => 3..15 inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS end ..which is a great way to DRY your :hair, don't you think? Basically, this gem 1) removes the requirement to have 'validates_' on the front of the commands and 2) passes the options on the validate_block command to each validation command inside the block. The syntax of the validation commands remains the same. Keeping the 'validates_*' prefix on the commands inside the block _will_ work but it is not required.

DRYing Our Cities projects by wrapping common behaviours

Report duplicate lines in your code, integrated with Textmate and Netbeans.

Provides extensions to ActionView::Helpers::CaptureHelper: content_for_with_default, no_content_for, and an enhanced content_for that plays nice with friends