Attestor
Validations and policies for immutable Ruby objects
The project is frozen in favor of the Assertion gem, that implements even more clean way of setting statements about objects, and validating them.
Motivation
I like the ActiveModel::Validations more than any other part of the whole Rails. The more I like it the more painful the problem that it mutates validated objects.
Every time you run validations, the collection of object's #errors is cleared and populated with new messages. So you can't validate frozen (immutable) objects without magic tricks.
To solve the problem, the attestor gem:
- Provides a simplest API for validating immutable objects.
- Makes it possible to isolate validators (as policy objects) from their targets.
- Allows policy objects to be composed by logical operations to provide complex policies.
Approach
Instead of collecting errors inside the object, the module defines two instance methods:
-
validate!raises an exception (Attestor::InvalidError), that carries errors outside of the object. -
validate- the safe version ofvalidate!. It rescues from the exception and returns a report object, that carries the exception as well as its error messages.
In both cases the inspected object stays untouched (and can be made immutable).
Installation
Add this line to your application's Gemfile:
# Gemfile
gem "attestor"Then execute:
bundle
Or add it manually:
gem install attestor
Base Use
Declare validation in the same way as ActiveModel's .validate method does:
Transfer = Struct.new(:debet, :credit) do
include Attestor::Validations
validate :consistent
private
def consistent
fraud = credit.sum - debet.sum
invalid :inconsistent, fraud: fraud if fraud != 0
end
endAlternatively, you can describe validation in a block, executed in an instance's scope:
class Transfer
# ...
validate { invalid :inconsistent if credit.sum != debet.sum }
endThe #invalid method translates its argument and raises an exception with the resulting message.
# config/locales/en.yml
---
en:
attestor:
errors:
transfer:
inconsistent: "Credit differs from debet by %{fraud}"To validate an object, use its #validate! method:
debet = OpenStruct.new(sum: 100)
credit = OpenStruct.new(sum: 90)
fraud_transfer = Transfer.new(debet, credit)
begin
transfer.validate! # with the bang
rescue Attestor::InvalidError => error
error.object == transfer # => true
error.messages # => ["Credit differs from debet by 10"]
endAlternatively use the safe version #validate.
It rescues from an exception and returns a corresponding report:
report = transfer.validate # without the bang
report.valid? # => false
report.invalid? # => true
report.object == transfer # => true
report.messages # => ["Credit differs from debet by 10"]
report.error # => <Attestor::InvalidError ...>Use of Contexts
Sometimes you need to validate the object agaist the subset of validations, not all of them.
To do this use :except and :only options of the .validate class method.
class Transfer
# ...
validate :consistent, except: :steal_of_money
endThen call a #validate!/#validate methods with that context:
fraud_transfer.validate! # => InvalidError
fraud_transfer.validate! :steal_of_money # => PASSES!You can use the same validator several times with different contexts. They will be used independently from each other.
class Transfer
# ...
validate :consistent, only: :fair_trade, :consistent
validate :consistent, only: :legal
endYou can group validations that uses shared context:
class Transfer
# This is the same as:
#
# validate :consistent, only: :fair_trade
# validate :limited, only: :fair_trade
validations only: :fair_trade do
validate :consistent
validate :limited
end
endDelegation
Extract validator to an external object (policy), that responds to validate!.
ConsistentTransfer = Struct.new(:debet, :credit) do
include Attestor::Validations
def validate!
invalid :inconsistent unless debet.sum == credit.sum
end
endThen use validates helper (with an "s" at the end):
class Transfer
# ...
validates { ConsistentTransfer.new(:debet, :credit) }
endor by method name:
class Transfer
# ...
validates :consistent_transfer
def consistent_transfer
ConsistentTransfer.new(:debet, :credit)
endThe difference between .validate :something and .validates :something methods is that:
-
.validateexpects#somethingto make checks and raise error by itself -
.validatesexpects#somethingto respond to#validate!
Policy Objects
Basically the policy includes Attestor::Validations with additional methods to allow logical compositions.
To create a policy as a Struct use the builder:
ConsistencyPolicy = Attestor::Policy.new(:debet, :credit) do
def validate!
fraud = credit - debet
invalid :inconsistent, fraud: fraud if fraud != 0
end
endIf you doesn't need Struct, include Attestor::Policy to the class and initialize its arguments somehow else:
class ConsistencyPolicy
include Attestor::Policy
# ...
endPolicy objects can be used by validates method like other objects that respond to #validate!:
class Transfer
# ...
validates { ConsistencyPolicy.new(debet, credit) }
endComplex Policies
Policies (assertions) can be combined by logical methods.
Suppose we have two policy objects:
valid_policy.validate.valid? # => true
invalid_policy.validate.valid? # => falseUse factory methods to provide compositions:
complex_policy = valid_policy.not
complex_policy.validate! # => fails
complex_policy = valid_policy.and(valid_policy, invalid_policy)
complex_policy.validate! # => fails
complex_policy = invalid_policy.or(invalid_policy, valid_policy)
complex_policy.validate! # => passes
complex_policy = valid_policy.xor(valid_poicy, valid_policy)
complex_policy.validate! # => fails
complex_policy = valid_policy.xor(valid_poicy, invalid_policy)
complex_policy.validate! # => passesThe or, and and xor methods called without argument(s) don't provide a policy object. They return lazy composer, expecting #not method.
complex_policy = valid_policy.and.not(invalid_policy, invalid_policy)
# this is the same as:
valid_policy.and(invalid_policy.not, invalid_policy.not)If you prefer wrapping to chaining, use the Policy factory methods instead:
Policy.and(valid_policy, invalid_policy)
# this is the same as: valid_policy.and(invalid_policy)
Policy.or(valid_policy, invalid_policy)
# this is the same as: valid_policy.or(invalid_policy)
Policy.xor(valid_policy, invalid_policy)
# this is the same as: valid_policy.xor(invalid_policy)
Policy.not(valid_policy)
# this is the same as: valid_policy.notAs before, you can use any number of policies (except for negation of a single policy) at any number of nesting.
RSpec helpers
In a RSpec tests you can use spies for valid and invalid objects:
-
valid_spyis a spy that returnsnilin response to#validate!and valid report in responce to#validate. -
invalid_spyraises on#validate!and returns invalid report in responce to#validatemethod call.
require "attestor/rspec"
describe "something" do
let(:valid_object) { valid_spy }
let(:invalid_object) { invalid_spy }
# ...
endTo check whether an arbitrary object is valid, simply use #validate method's result:
expect(object.validate).to be_valid
expect(object.validate).to be_invalidCompatibility
Tested under rubies compatible to rubies with API 1.9.3+:
- MRI 1.9.3+
- Rubinius-2 (modes 1.9+)
- JRuby 9.0.0.0.pre1+
Uses RSpec 3.0+ for testing and hexx-suit for dev/test tools collection.
Contributing
- Read the STYLEGUIDE.
- Fork the project
- Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b my-new-feature) - Add tests for it
- Commit your changes (
git commit -am '[UPDATE] Add some feature') - Push to the branch (
git push origin my-new-feature) - Create a new Pull Request
Latest Changes
See the CHANGELOG
License
See the MIT LICENSE.