Project

pbt

0.0
The project is in a healthy, maintained state
Property-Based Testing tool for Ruby, utilizing Ractor for parallelizing test cases.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
 Dependencies
 Project Readme

Property-Based Testing in Ruby

Gem Version Build Status RubyDoc

A property-based testing tool for Ruby with experimental features that allow you to run test cases in parallel.

PBT stands for Property-Based Testing.

What's Property-Based Testing?

Property-Based Testing is a testing methodology that focuses on the properties a system should always satisfy, rather than checking individual examples. Instead of writing tests for predefined inputs and outputs, PBT allows you to specify the general characteristics that your code should adhere to and then automatically generates a wide range of inputs to verify these properties.

The key benefits of property-based testing include the ability to cover more edge cases and the potential to discover bugs that traditional example-based tests might miss. It's particularly useful for identifying unexpected behaviors in your code by testing it against a vast set of inputs, including those you might not have considered.

For a more in-depth understanding of Property-Based Testing, please refer to external resources.

Installation

Add this line to your application's Gemfile and run bundle install.

gem 'pbt'

Off course you can install with gem intstall pbt.

Basic Usage

Simple property

# Let's say you have a method that returns just a multiplicative inverse.
def multiplicative_inverse(number)
  Rational(1, number)
end

Pbt.assert do
  # The given block is executed 100 times with different random numbers.
  # Besides, the block runs in parallel by Ractor.
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |number|
    result = multiplicative_inverse(number)
    raise "Result should be the multiplicative inverse of the number" if result * number != 1
  end
end

# If the function has a bug, the test fails with a counterexample.
# For example, the multiplicative_inverse method doesn't work for 0 regardless of the behavior is intended or not.
#
# Pbt::PropertyFailure:
#   Property failed after 23 test(s)
#   { seed: 11001296583699917659214176011685741769 }
#   Counterexample: 0
#   Shrunk 3 time(s)
#   Got ZeroDivisionError: divided by 0

Explain The Snippet

The above snippet is very simple but contains the basic components.

Runner

Pbt.assert is the runner. The runner interprets and executes the given property. Pbt.assert takes a property and runs it multiple times. If the property fails, it tries to shrink the input that caused the failure.

Property

The snippet above declared a property by calling Pbt.property. The property describes the following:

  1. What the user wants to evaluate. This corresponds to the block (let's call this predicate) enclosed by do end
  2. How to generate inputs for the predicate — using Arbitrary

The predicate block is a function that directly asserts, taking values generated by Arbitrary as input.

Arbitrary

Arbitrary generates random values. It is also responsible for shrinking those values if asked to shrink a failed value as input.

Here, we used only one type of arbitrary, Pbt.integer. There are many other built-in arbitraries, and you can create a variety of inputs by combining existing ones.

Shrink

In PBT, If a test fails, it attempts to shrink the case that caused the failure into a form that is easier for humans to understand. In other words, instead of stopping the test itself the first time it fails and reporting the failed value, it tries to find the minimal value that causes the error.

When there is a test that fails when given an even number, a counterexample of 2 is simpler and easier to understand than 432743417662.

Arbitrary

There are many built-in arbitraries in Pbt. You can use them to generate random values for your tests. Here are some representative arbitraries.

Primitives

rng = Random.new

Pbt.integer.generate(rng) # => 42
Pbt.integer(min: -1, max: 8).generate(rng) # => Integer between -1 and 8

Pbt.symbol.generate(rng) # => :atq

Pbt.ascii_char.generate(rng) # => "a"
Pbt.ascii_string.generate(rng) # => "aagjZfao"

Pbt.boolean.generate(rng) # => true or false
Pbt.constant(42).generate(rng) # => 42 always

Composites

rng = Random.new

Pbt.array(Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => [121, -13141, 9825]
Pbt.array(Pbt.integer, max: 1, empty: true).generate(rng) # => [] or [42] etc.

Pbt.tuple(Pbt.symbol, Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => [:atq, 42]

Pbt.fixed_hash(x: Pbt.symbol, y: Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => {x: :atq, y: 42}
Pbt.hash(Pbt.symbol, Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => {atq: 121, ygab: -1142}

Pbt.one_of(:a, 1, 0.1).generate(rng) # => :a or 1 or 0.1

See ArbitraryMethods module for more details.

What if property-based tests fail?

Once a test fails it's time to debug. Pbt provides some features to help you debug.

How to reproduce

When a test fails, you'll see a message like below.

Pbt::PropertyFailure:
  Property failed after 23 test(s)
  { seed: 11001296583699917659214176011685741769 }
  Counterexample: 0
  Shrunk 3 time(s)
  Got ZeroDivisionError: divided by 0
  # and backtraces

You can reproduce the failure by passing the seed to Pbt.assert.

Pbt.assert(seed: 11001296583699917659214176011685741769) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |number|
    # your test
  end
end

Verbose mode

You may want to know which values pass and which values fail. You can enable verbose mode by passing verbose: true to Pbt.assert.

Pbt.assert(verbose: true) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.array(Pbt.integer)) do |numbers|
    # your failed test
  end
end

The verbose mode prints the results of each tested values.

Encountered failures were:
- [152477, 666997, -531468, -92182, 623948, 425913, 656138, 856463, -64529]
- [76239, 666997, -531468, -92182, 623948]
- [76239, 666997, -531468]
(snipped for README)
- [2, 163]
- [2, 11]

Execution summary:
. × [152477, 666997, -531468, -92182, 623948, 425913, 656138, 856463, -64529]
. . √ [152477, 666997, -531468, -92182, 623948]
. . √ [-64529]
. . × [76239, 666997, -531468, -92182, 623948, 425913, 656138, 856463, -64529]
. . . × [76239, 666997, -531468, -92182, 623948]
(snipped for README)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [2, 21]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . × [2, 11]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ []
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [2, 1]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [2, 0]

Configuration

You can configure Pbt by calling Pbt.configure before running tests.

Pbt.configure do |config|
  # Whether to print verbose output. Default is `false`.
  config.verbose = 100

  # The concurrency method to use. `:ractor`, `:thread`, `:process` and `:none` are supported. Default is `:none`.
  config.worker = :none

  # The number of runs to perform. Default is `100`.
  config.num_runs = 100

  # The seed to use for random number generation.
  # It's useful to reproduce failed test with the seed you'd pick up from failure messages. Default is a random seed.
  config.seed = 42

  # Whether to report exceptions in threads.
  # It's useful to suppress error logs on Ractor that reports many errors. Default is `false`.
  config.thread_report_on_exception = false

  # Whether to allow RSpec expectation and matchers in Ractor. It's quite experimental! Default is `false`.
  config.experimental_ractor_rspec_integration = false
end

Or, you can pass the configuration to Pbt.assert as an argument.

Pbt.assert(num_runs: 100, seed: 42) do
  # ...
end

Concurrency methods

One of the key features of Pbt is its ability to rapidly execute test cases in parallel or concurrently, using a large number of values (by default, 100) generated by Arbitrary.

For concurrent processing, you can specify any of the three workers—:ractor, :process, or :thread—using the worker option. Alternatively, choose :none for serial execution.

Pbt supports 3 concurrency methods and 1 sequential one. You can choose one of them by setting the worker option.

Be aware that the performance of each method depends on the test subject. For example, if the test subject is CPU-bound, :ractor may be the best choice. Otherwise, :none shall be the best choice for most cases. See benchmarks.

Ractor

:ractor worker is useful for test cases that are CPU-bound. But it's experimental and has some limitations as described below. If you encounter any issues due to those limitations, consider using :process as workers whose benchmark is the most similar to :ractor.

Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
    # ...
  end
end

Limitation

Please note that Ractor support is an experimental feature of this gem. Due to Ractor's limitations, you may encounter some issues when using it.

For example, you cannot access anything out of block.

a = 1

Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
    # You cannot access `a` here because this block is executed in a Ractor and it doesn't allow implicit sharing of objects.
    a + n # => Ractor::RemoteError (can not share object between ractors)
  end
end

You cannot use any methods provided by test frameworks like expect or assert because they are not available in a Ractor.

it do
  Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor) do
    Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
      # This is not possible because `self` if a Ractor here.
      expect(n).to be_an(Integer) # => Ractor::RemoteError (cause by NoMethodError for `expect` or `be_an`)
    end
  end
end

If you're a challenger, you can enable the experimental feature to allow using RSpec expectations and matchers in Ractor. It works but it's quite experimental and could cause unexpected behaviors.

Please note that this feature depends on prism gem. If you use Ruby 3.2 or prior, you need to install the gem by yourself.

it do
  Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor, experimental_ractor_rspec_integration: true) do
    Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
      # Some RSpec expectations and matchers are available in Ractor by hack.
      # Other features like `let`, `subject`, `before`, `after` that access out of block are still not available.
      expect(n).to be_an(Integer)
    end
  end
end

Process

If you'd like to run test cases that are CPU-bound and :ractor is not available, :process becomes a good choice.

Pbt.assert(worker: :process) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
    # ...
  end
end

If you want to use :process, you need to install the parallel gem.

Thread

You may not need to run test cases with multi-threads.

Pbt.assert(worker: :thread) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
    # ...
  end
end

If you want to use :thread, you need to install the parallel gem.

None

For most cases, :none is the best choice. It runs tests sequentially (without parallelism) but most test cases finishes within a reasonable time.

Pbt.assert(worker: :none) do
  Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
    # ...
  end
end

TODOs

Once this project finishes the following, we will release v1.0.0.

  • Implement basic primitive arbitraries
  • Implement composite arbitraries
  • Support shrinking
  • Support multiple concurrency methods
    • Ractor
    • Process
    • Thread
    • None (Run tests sequentially)
  • Documentation
    • Add better examples
    • Arbitrary usage
    • Configuration
  • Benchmark
  • Rich report by verbose mode
  • (Partially) Allow to use expectations and matchers provided by test framework in Ractor if possible.
    • It'd be so hard to pass assertions like expect, assert to a Ractor.
  • Implement frequency arbitrary
  • Statistics feature to aggregate generated values
  • Decide DSL

Development

Setup

bin/setup
bundle exec rake # Run tests and lint at once

Test

bundle exec rspec

Lint

bundle exec rake standard:fix

Contributing

Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/ohbarye/pbt. This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the code of conduct.

License

The gem is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.

Credits

This project draws a lot of inspiration from other testing tools, namely

Code of Conduct

Everyone interacting in the Pbt project's codebases, issue trackers, chat rooms and mailing lists is expected to follow the code of conduct.