Roast
A convention-oriented framework for creating structured AI workflows, maintained by the Augmented Engineering team at Shopify.
Installation
$ gem install roast-ai
Or add to your Gemfile:
gem 'roast-ai'
Why you should use Roast
Roast provides a structured, declarative approach to building AI workflows with:
- Convention over configuration: Define powerful workflows using simple YAML configuration files and prompts written in markdown (with ERB support)
- Built-in tools: Ready-to-use tools for file operations, search, and AI interactions
- Ruby integration: When prompts aren't enough, write custom steps in Ruby using a clean, extensible architecture
- Shared context: Each step shares its conversation transcript with its parent workflow by default
- Step customization: Steps can be fully configured with their own AI models and parameters.
- Session replay: Rerun previous sessions starting at a specified step to speed up development time
- Parallel execution: Run multiple steps concurrently to speed up workflow execution
- Function caching: Flexibly cache the results of tool function calls to speed up workflows
- Extensive instrumentation: Monitor and track workflow execution, AI calls, and tool usage (see instrumentation documentation)
What does it look like?
Here's a simple workflow that analyzes test files:
name: analyze_tests
# Default model for all steps
model: gpt-4o-mini
tools:
- Roast::Tools::ReadFile
- Roast::Tools::Grep
steps:
- read_test_file
- analyze_coverage
- generate_report
# Step-specific model overrides the global model
analyze_coverage:
model: gpt-4-turbo
json: true
# Step-specific config that specifies a custom path, not in the current directory
generate_report:
path: ../reporting/generate_report
Each step can have its own prompt file (e.g., analyze_coverage/prompt.md
) and configuration. Steps can be run in parallel by nesting them in arrays:
steps:
- prepare_data
-
- analyze_code_quality
- check_test_coverage
- verify_documentation
- generate_final_report
Workflows can include steps that run bash commands (wrap in $()
), use interpolation with {{}}
syntax, and even simple inlined prompts as a natural language string.
steps:
- analyze_spec
- create_minitest
- run_and_improve
- $(bundle exec rubocop -A {{file}})
- Summarize the changes made to {{File.basename(file)}}.
Try it
If you donβt have one already, get an OpenAI key from here. You will need an account with a credit card and credits applied to the associated project. Make sure that a basic completion works:
export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-proj-....
curl -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" \
-d '{"model":"gpt-4.1-mini","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"What is 1+1?"}]}' \
https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions
The test grading workflow in this repository is a senior software engineer and testing expert that evaluates the quality of a test based on guidelines.
Try the workflow.
./exe/roast execute examples/grading/workflow.yml test/roast/resources_test.rb
π₯π₯π₯ Everyone loves a good roast π₯π₯π₯
...
This will output a test grade.
========== TEST GRADE REPORT ==========
Test file: test/roast/resources_test.rb
FINAL GRADE:
Score: 80/100
Letter Grade: B
Note that you may also need shadowenv
and rg
, on MacOS run brew install shadowenv
and brew install rg
.
How to use Roast
- Create a workflow YAML file defining your steps and tools
- Create prompt files for each step (e.g.,
step_name/prompt.md
) - Run the workflow:
# With a target file
roast execute workflow.yml target_file.rb
# Or for a targetless workflow (API calls, data generation, etc.)
roast execute workflow.yml
# Roast will automatically search in `project_root/roast/workflow_name` if the path is incomplete.
roast execute my_cool_workflow # Equivalent to `roast execute roast/my_cool_workflow/workflow.yml
Understanding Workflows
In Roast, workflows maintain a single conversation with the AI model throughout execution. Each step represents one or more user-assistant interactions within this conversation, with optional tool calls. Steps naturally build upon each other through the shared context.
Step Types
Roast supports several types of steps:
-
Standard step: References a directory containing at least a
prompt.md
and optionaloutput.txt
template. This is the most common type of step.
steps:
- analyze_code
As an alternative to a directory, you can also implement a custom step as a Ruby class, optionally extending Roast::Workflow::BaseStep
.
In the example given above, the script would live at workflow/analyze_code.rb
and should contain a class named AnalyzeCode
with an initializer that takes a workflow object as context, and a call
method that will be invoked to run the step. The result of the call
method will be stored in the workflow.output
hash.
-
Parallel steps: Groups of steps executed concurrently
steps: - - analyze_code_quality - check_test_coverage
-
Command execution step: Executes shell commands directly, just wrap in
$(expr)
steps: - $(command line expr) - rubocop: $(bundle exec rubocop -A)
This will execute the command and store the result in the workflow output hash. Explicit key name is optional (
rubocop
in the second line of the example).By default, commands that exit with non-zero status will halt the workflow. You can configure steps to continue on error:
steps: - lint_check: $(rubocop {{file}}) - fix_issues # Step configuration lint_check: exit_on_error: false # Continue workflow even if command fails
When
exit_on_error: false
, the command output will include the exit status, allowing subsequent steps to process error information. -
Conditional steps: Execute different steps based on conditions using
if/unless
steps: - check_environment: if: "{{ENV['RAILS_ENV'] == 'production'}}" then: - run_production_checks - notify_team else: - run_development_setup - verify_dependencies: unless: "$(bundle check)" then: - bundle_install: "$(bundle install)"
Conditions can be:
- Ruby expressions:
if: "{{output['count'] > 5}}"
- Bash commands:
if: "$(test -f config.yml && echo true)"
(exit code 0 = true) - Step references:
if: "previous_step_name"
(uses the step's output) - Direct values:
if: "true"
orif: "false"
- Ruby expressions:
-
Iteration steps: Loop over collections or repeat steps with conditions
steps: # Loop over a collection - process_files: each: "{{Dir.glob('**/*.rb')}}" as: current_file steps: - analyze_file - Generate a report for {{current_file}} # Repeat until a condition is met - improve_code: repeat: until: "{{output['test_pass'] == true}}" max_iterations: 5 steps: - run_tests - fix_issues
Each loops support:
- Collections from Ruby expressions:
each: "{{[1, 2, 3]}}"
- Command output:
each: "$(ls *.rb)"
- Step references:
each: "file_list"
Repeat loops support:
- Until conditions:
until: "{{condition}}"
- Maximum iterations:
max_iterations: 10
- Collections from Ruby expressions:
-
Case/when/else steps: Select different execution paths based on a value (similar to Ruby's case statement)
steps: - detect_language - case: "{{ workflow.output.detect_language }}" when: ruby: - lint_with_rubocop - test_with_rspec javascript: - lint_with_eslint - test_with_jest python: - lint_with_pylint - test_with_pytest else: - analyze_generic - generate_basic_report
Case expressions can be:
- Workflow outputs:
case: "{{ workflow.output.variable }}"
- Ruby expressions:
case: "{{ count > 10 ? 'high' : 'low' }}"
- Bash commands:
case: "$(echo $ENVIRONMENT)"
- Direct values:
case: "production"
The value is compared against each key in the
when
clause, and matching steps are executed. If no match is found, theelse
steps are executed (if provided). - Workflow outputs:
-
Raw prompt step: Simple text prompts for the model without tools
steps: - Summarize the changes made to the codebase.
This creates a simple prompt-response interaction without tool calls or looping. It's detected by the presence of spaces in the step name and is useful for summarization or simple questions at the end of a workflow.
-
Agent step: Direct pass-through to coding agents (e.g., Claude Code)
steps: - ^fix_linting_errors # File-based agent prompt - ^Review the code and identify any performance issues # Inline agent prompt - regular_analysis # Normal step through LLM
Agent steps are prefixed with
^
and send the prompt content directly to the CodingAgent tool without LLM translation. This is useful when you want to give precise instructions to a coding agent without the intermediate interpretation layer. Agent steps support both file-based prompts (fix_linting_errors/prompt.md
) and inline prompts (text with spaces). -
Input step: Interactive prompts for user input during workflow execution
steps: - analyze_code - get_user_feedback: prompt: "Should we proceed with the refactoring? (yes/no)" type: confirm - review_changes: prompt: "Enter your review comments" type: text - select_strategy: prompt: "Choose optimization strategy" type: select options: - "Performance optimization" - "Memory optimization" - "Code clarity" - api_configuration: prompt: "Enter API key" type: password
Input steps pause workflow execution to collect user input. They support several types:
-
text
: Free-form text input (default if type not specified) -
confirm
: Yes/No confirmation prompts -
select
: Choice from a list of options -
password
: Masked input for sensitive data
The user's input is stored in the workflow output using the step name as the key and can be accessed in subsequent steps via interpolation (e.g.,
{{output.get_user_feedback}}
). -
Step Configuration
Steps can be configured with various options to control their behavior:
steps:
- analyze_code # Simple step reference
- generate_report: # Step with configuration
model: gpt-4o # Override the global model for this step
print_response: true # Explicitly control output printing
json: true # Request JSON-formatted response
params: # Additional parameters for the API call
temperature: 0.8
Configuration options:
-
model
: Override the workflow's default model for this specific step -
print_response
: Control whether the step's response is included in the final output (default:false
, except for the last step which defaults totrue
as of v0.3.1) -
json
: Request a JSON-formatted response from the model -
params
: Additional parameters passed to the model API (temperature, max_tokens, etc.) -
path
: Custom directory path for the step's prompt files -
coerce_to
: Type coercion for the step result (:boolean
,:llm_boolean
,:iterable
)
Automatic Last Step Output: As of version 0.3.1, the last step in a workflow automatically has print_response: true
unless explicitly configured otherwise. This ensures that newcomers to Roast see output from their workflows by default.
Shared Configuration
Roast supports sharing common configuration and steps across multiple workflows using a shared.yml
file.
- Place a
shared.yml
file one level above your workflow directory - Define YAML anchors for common configurations like tools, models or steps
- Reference these anchors in your workflow files using YAML alias syntax
Example structure:
my_project/
βββ shared.yml # Common configuration anchors
βββ workflows/
βββ analyze_code.yml
βββ generate_docs.yml
βββ test_suite.yml
Example shared.yml
:
# Define common tools
standard_tools: &standard_tools
- Roast::Tools::Grep
- Roast::Tools::ReadFile
- Roast::Tools::WriteFile
- Roast::Tools::SearchFile
Using in workflows:
name: Code Analysis Workflow
tools: *standard_tools # Reference shared tools
steps:
...
Data Flow Between Steps
Roast handles data flow between steps in three primary ways:
-
Conversation Context (Implicit): The LLM naturally remembers the entire conversation history, including all previous prompts and responses. In most cases, this is all you need for a step to reference and build upon previous results. This is the preferred approach for most prompt-oriented workflows.
-
Output Hash (Explicit): Each step's result is automatically stored in the
workflow.output
hash using the step name as the key. This programmatic access is mainly useful when:- You need to perform non-LLM transformations on data
- You're writing custom output logic
- You need to access specific values for presentation or logging
-
Interpolation (Dynamic): You can use
{{expression}}
syntax to inject values from the workflow context directly into step names, commands, or prompt text. For example:steps: - analyze_file - $(rubocop -A {{file}}) - Generate a summary for {{file}} - result_for_{{file}}: store_results
Interpolation supports:
- Simple variable access:
{{file}}
,{{resource.target}}
- Access to step outputs:
{{output['previous_step']}}
- Any valid Ruby expression evaluated in the workflow context:
{{File.basename(file)}}
- Simple variable access:
For typical AI workflows, the continuous conversation history provides seamless data flow without requiring explicit access to the output hash. Steps can simply refer to previous information in their prompts, and the AI model will use its memory of the conversation to provide context-aware responses. For more dynamic requirements, the interpolation syntax provides a convenient way to inject context-specific values into steps.
Command Line Options
Basic Options
-
-o, --output FILE
: Save results to a file instead of outputting to STDOUT -
-c, --concise
: Use concise output templates (exposed as a boolean flag onworkflow
) -
-v, --verbose
: Show output from all steps as they execute -
-r, --replay STEP_NAME
: Resume a workflow from a specific step, optionally with a specific session timestamp -
-f, --file-storage
: Use filesystem storage for sessions instead of SQLite (default: SQLite)
Workflow Validation
Roast provides a validate
command to check workflow configuration files for errors and potential issues before execution:
# Validate a specific workflow
roast validate workflow.yml
# Validate a workflow in a subdirectory
roast validate my_workflow
# Validate with strict mode (treats warnings as errors)
roast validate workflow.yml --strict
The validator checks for:
- YAML syntax errors
- Missing required fields
- Invalid step references
- Circular dependencies
- Tool availability
- Prompt file existence
- Configuration consistency
This helps catch configuration errors early and ensures workflows will run smoothly.
Session Storage and Management
Roast uses SQLite by default for session storage, providing better performance and advanced querying capabilities. Sessions are automatically saved during workflow execution, capturing each step's state including conversation transcripts and outputs.
Storage Options:
# Use default SQLite storage (recommended)
roast execute workflow.yml
# Use legacy filesystem storage
roast execute workflow.yml --file-storage
# Set storage type via environment variable
ROAST_STATE_STORAGE=file roast execute workflow.yml
Session Management Commands:
# List all sessions
roast sessions
# Filter sessions by status
roast sessions --status waiting
# Filter sessions by workflow
roast sessions --workflow my_workflow
# Show sessions older than 7 days
roast sessions --older-than 7d
# Clean up old sessions
roast sessions --cleanup --older-than 30d
# View detailed session information
roast session <session_id>
Session Replay
The session replay feature allows you to resume workflows from specific steps, saving time during development and debugging:
# Resume from a specific step
roast execute workflow.yml -r step_name
# Resume from a specific step in a specific session
roast execute workflow.yml -r 20250507_123456_789:step_name
This feature is particularly useful when:
- Debugging specific steps in a long workflow
- Iterating on prompts without rerunning the entire workflow
- Resuming after failures in long-running workflows
Storage Locations:
- SQLite:
~/.roast/sessions.db
(configurable viaROAST_SESSIONS_DB
) - Filesystem:
.roast/sessions/
directory in your project
Target Option (-t, --target
)
The target option is highly flexible and accepts several formats:
Single file path:
roast execute workflow.yml -t path/to/file.rb
# is equivalent to
roast execute workflow.yml path/to/file.rb
Directory path:
roast execute workflow.yml -t path/to/directory
# Roast will run on the directory as a resource
Glob patterns:
roast execute workflow.yml -t "**/*_test.rb"
# Roast will run the workflow on each matching file
URL as target:
roast execute workflow.yml -t "https://api.example.com/data"
# Roast will run the workflow using the URL as a resource
API configuration (Fetch API-style):
roast execute workflow.yml -t '{
"url": "https://api.example.com/resource",
"options": {
"method": "POST",
"headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": "Bearer ${API_TOKEN}"
},
"body": {
"query": "search term",
"limit": 10
}
}
}'
# Roast will recognize this as an API configuration with Fetch API-style format
Shell command execution with $(...):
roast execute workflow.yml -t "$(find . -name '*.rb' -mtime -1)"
# Roast will run the workflow on each file returned (expects one per line)
Git integration examples:
# Process changed test files
roast execute workflow.yml -t "$(git diff --name-only HEAD | grep _test.rb)"
# Process staged files
roast execute workflow.yml -t "$(git diff --cached --name-only)"
Targetless Workflows
Roast also supports workflows that don't operate on a specific pre-defined set of target files:
API-driven workflows:
name: API Integration Workflow
tools:
- Roast::Tools::ReadFile
- Roast::Tools::WriteFile
# Dynamic API token using shell command
api_token: $(cat ~/.my_token)
# Option 1: Use a targetless workflow with API logic in steps
steps:
- fetch_api_data # Step will make API calls
- transform_data
- generate_report
# Option 2: Specify an API target directly in the workflow
target: '{
"url": "https://api.example.com/resource",
"options": {
"method": "GET",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer ${API_TOKEN}"
}
}
}'
steps:
- process_api_response
- generate_report
Data generation workflows:
name: Generate Documentation
tools:
- Roast::Tools::WriteFile
steps:
- generate_outline
- write_documentation
- create_examples
These targetless workflows are ideal for:
- API integrations
- Content generation
- Report creation
- Interactive tools
- Scheduled automation tasks
Global Model Configuration
You can set a default model for all steps in your workflow by specifying the model
parameter at the top level:
name: My Workflow
model: gpt-4o-mini # Will be used for all steps unless overridden
Individual steps can override this setting with their own model parameter:
analyze_data:
model: anthropic/claude-3-haiku # Takes precedence over the global model
API Provider Configuration
Roast supports both OpenAI and OpenRouter as API providers. By default, Roast uses OpenAI, but you can specify OpenRouter:
name: My Workflow
api_provider: openrouter
api_token: $(echo $OPENROUTER_API_KEY)
model: anthropic/claude-3-opus-20240229
Benefits of using OpenRouter:
- Access to multiple model providers through a single API
- Support for models from Anthropic, Meta, Mistral, and more
- Consistent API interface across different model providers
When using OpenRouter, specify fully qualified model names including the provider prefix (e.g., anthropic/claude-3-opus-20240229
).
Dynamic API Tokens and URIs
Roast allows you to dynamically fetch attributes such as API token and URI base (to use with a proxy) via shell commands directly in your workflow configuration:
# This will execute the shell command and use the result as the API token
api_token: $(print-token --key)
# For OpenAI (default)
api_token: $(echo $OPENAI_API_KEY)
# For OpenRouter (requires api_provider setting)
api_provider: openrouter
api_token: $(echo $OPENROUTER_API_KEY)
# Static Proxy URI
uri_base: https://proxy.example.com/v1
# Dynamic Proxy URI
uri_base: $(echo $AI_PROXY_URI_BASE)
This makes it easy to use environment-specific tokens without hardcoding credentials, especially useful in development environments or CI/CD pipelines. Alternatively, Roast will fall back to OPENROUTER_API_KEY
or OPENAI_API_KEY
environment variables based on the specified provider.
Template Output with ERB
Each step can have an output.txt
file that uses ERB templating to format the final output. This allows you to customize how the AI's response is processed and displayed.
Example step_name/output.txt
:
<% if workflow.verbose %>
Detailed Analysis:
<%= response %>
<% else %>
Summary: <%= response.lines.first %>
<% end %>
Files analyzed: <%= workflow.file %>
Status: <%= workflow.output['status'] || 'completed' %>
This is an example of where the workflow.output
hash is useful - formatting output for display based on data from previous steps.
Available in templates:
-
response
: The AI's response for this step -
workflow
: Access to the workflow object -
workflow.output
: The shared hash containing results from all steps when you need programmatic access -
workflow.file
: Current file being processed (ornil
for targetless workflows) - All workflow configuration options
For most workflows, you'll mainly use response
to access the current step's results. The workflow.output
hash becomes valuable when you need to reference specific data points from previous steps in your templates or for conditional display logic.
Advanced Features
Instrumentation
Roast provides extensive instrumentation capabilities using ActiveSupport::Notifications. You can monitor workflow execution, track AI model usage, measure performance, and integrate with external monitoring systems. Read the full instrumentation documentation.
Built-in Tools
Roast provides several built-in tools that you can use in your workflows:
Tool Configuration
Tools can be configured using a hash format in your workflow YAML:
tools:
- Roast::Tools::ReadFile # No configuration needed
- Roast::Tools::Cmd: # With configuration
allowed_commands:
- git
- npm
- yarn
- Roast::Tools::CodingAgent: # Optional configuration
coding_agent_command: claude --model opus -p --allowedTools "Bash, Glob, Grep, LS, Read"
Currently supported configurations:
-
Roast::Tools::Cmd
viaallowed_commands
: restricts which commands can be executed (defaults to:pwd
,find
,ls
,rake
,ruby
,dev
,mkdir
) -
Roast::Tools::CodingAgent
viacoding_agent_command
: customizes the Claude Code CLI command used by the agent
Cmd Tool Configuration
The Cmd
tool's allowed_commands
can be configured in two ways:
1. Simple String Format (uses default descriptions):
tools:
- Roast::Tools::Cmd:
allowed_commands:
- pwd
- ls
- git
2. Hash Format with Custom Descriptions:
tools:
- Roast::Tools::Cmd:
allowed_commands:
- pwd
- name: git
description: "git CLI - version control system with subcommands like status, commit, push"
- name: npm
description: "npm CLI - Node.js package manager with subcommands like install, run"
- name: docker
description: "Docker CLI - container platform with subcommands like build, run, ps"
Custom descriptions help the LLM understand when and how to use each command, making your workflows more effective.
Step-Level Tool Filtering
You can restrict which tools are available to specific steps using the available_tools
configuration:
# Define all tools globally
tools:
- Roast::Tools::Grep
- Roast::Tools::ReadFile
- Roast::Tools::WriteFile
- Roast::Tools::Cmd:
allowed_commands:
- pwd
- ls
- echo
# Configure steps with specific tool access
explore_directory:
available_tools:
- pwd
- ls
analyze_files:
available_tools:
- grep
- read_file
write_summary:
available_tools:
- write_file
- echo
This feature provides:
- Security: Each step only has access to the tools it needs
- Performance: Reduces the tool list sent to the LLM
- Clarity: Makes tool usage explicit for each step
Key points:
- Use snake_case tool names (e.g.,
read_file
forRoast::Tools::ReadFile
) - For
Cmd
tool, use the specific command names (e.g.,pwd
,ls
) - When
available_tools
is not specified, all tools remain available (backward compatible) - Empty array (
available_tools: []
) means no tools for that step
See the available_tools_demo for a complete example.
ReadFile
Reads the contents of a file from the filesystem.
# Basic usage
read_file(path: "path/to/file.txt")
# Reading a specific portion of a file
read_file(path: "path/to/large_file.txt", offset: 100, limit: 50)
- The
path
can be absolute or relative to the current working directory - Use
offset
andlimit
for large files to read specific sections (line numbers) - Returns the file content as a string
WriteFile
Writes content to a file, creating the file if it doesn't exist or overwriting it if it does.
# Basic usage
write_file(path: "output.txt", content: "This is the file content")
# With path restriction for security
write_file(
path: "output.txt",
content: "Restricted content",
restrict: "/safe/directory" # Only allows writing to files under this path
)
- Creates missing directories automatically
- Can restrict file operations to specific directories for security
- Returns a success message with the number of lines written
UpdateFiles
Applies a unified diff/patch to one or more files. Changes are applied atomically when possible.
update_files(
diff: <<~DIFF,
--- a/file1.txt
+++ b/file1.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
line1
+new line
line2
line3
--- a/file2.txt
+++ b/file2.txt
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
line5
line6
-old line7
+updated line7
line8
DIFF
base_path: "/path/to/project", # Optional, defaults to current working directory
restrict_path: "/path/to/allowed", # Optional, restricts where files can be modified
create_files: true, # Optional, defaults to true
)
- Accepts standard unified diff format from tools like
git diff
- Supports multiple file changes in a single operation
- Handles file creation, deletion, and modification
- Performs atomic operations with rollback on failure
- Includes fuzzy matching to handle minor context differences
- This tool is especially useful for making targeted changes to multiple files at once
Grep
Searches file contents for a specific pattern using regular expressions.
# Basic usage
grep(pattern: "function\\s+myFunction")
# With file filtering
grep(pattern: "class\\s+User", include: "*.rb")
# With directory scope
grep(pattern: "TODO:", path: "src/components")
- Uses regular expressions for powerful pattern matching
- Can filter by file types using the
include
parameter - Can scope searches to specific directories with the
path
parameter - Returns a list of files containing matches
SearchFile
Provides advanced file search capabilities beyond basic pattern matching.
search_file(query: "class User", file_path: "app/models")
- Combines pattern matching with contextual search
- Useful for finding specific code structures or patterns
- Returns matched lines with context
Cmd
Executes shell commands with configurable restrictions. By default, only allows specific safe commands.
# Execute allowed commands (pwd, find, ls, rake, ruby, dev, mkdir by default)
pwd(args: "-L")
ls(args: "-la")
ruby(args: "-e 'puts RUBY_VERSION'")
# Or use the legacy cmd function with full command
cmd(command: "ls -la")
- Commands are registered as individual functions based on allowed_commands configuration
- Default allowed commands: pwd, find, ls, rake, ruby, dev, mkdir
- Each command has built-in descriptions to help the LLM understand usage
- Configurable via workflow YAML (see Tool Configuration section)
Bash
Executes shell commands without restrictions. β οΈ WARNING: Use only in trusted environments!
# Execute any command - no restrictions
bash(command: "curl https://api.example.com | jq '.data'")
# Complex operations with pipes and redirects
bash(command: "find . -name '*.log' -mtime +30 -delete")
# System administration tasks
bash(command: "ps aux | grep ruby | awk '{print $2}'")
- No command restrictions - full shell access
- Designed for prototyping and development environments
- Logs warnings by default (disable with
ROAST_BASH_WARNINGS=false
) - Should NOT be used in production or untrusted contexts
- See
examples/bash_prototyping/
for usage examples
CodingAgent
Creates a specialized agent for complex coding tasks or long-running operations.
coding_agent(
task: "Refactor the authentication module to use JWT tokens",
language: "ruby",
files: ["app/models/user.rb", "app/controllers/auth_controller.rb"]
)
- Delegates complex tasks to a specialized coding agent
- Useful for tasks that require deep code understanding or multi-step changes
- Can work across multiple files and languages
MCP (Model Context Protocol) Tools
Roast supports MCP tools, allowing you to integrate external services and tools through the Model Context Protocol standard. MCP enables seamless connections to databases, APIs, and specialized tools.
Configuring MCP Tools
MCP tools are configured in the tools
section of your workflow YAML alongside traditional Roast tools:
tools:
# Traditional Roast tools
- Roast::Tools::ReadFile
# MCP tools with SSE (Server-Sent Events)
- Documentation:
url: https://gitmcp.io/myorg/myrepo/docs
env:
- "Authorization: Bearer {{ENV['API_TOKEN']}}"
# MCP tools with stdio
- GitHub:
command: npx
args: ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"]
env:
GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN: "{{ENV['GITHUB_TOKEN']}}"
only:
- search_repositories
- get_issue
- create_issue
SSE MCP Tools
Connect to HTTP endpoints implementing the MCP protocol:
- Tool Name:
url: https://example.com/mcp-endpoint
env:
- "Authorization: Bearer {{resource.api_token}}"
only: [function1, function2] # Optional whitelist
except: [function3] # Optional blacklist
Stdio MCP Tools
Connect to local processes implementing the MCP protocol:
- Tool Name:
command: docker
args: ["run", "-i", "--rm", "ghcr.io/example/mcp-server"]
env:
API_KEY: "{{ENV['API_KEY']}}"
See the MCP tools example for complete documentation and more examples.
Custom Tools
You can create your own tools using the Raix function dispatch pattern. Custom tools should be placed in .roast/initializers/
(subdirectories are supported):
# .roast/initializers/tools/git_analyzer.rb
module MyProject
module Tools
module GitAnalyzer
extend self
def self.included(base)
base.class_eval do
function(
:analyze_commit,
"Analyze a git commit for code quality and changes",
commit_sha: { type: "string", description: "The SHA of the commit to analyze" },
include_diff: { type: "boolean", description: "Include the full diff in the analysis", default: false }
) do |params|
GitAnalyzer.call(params[:commit_sha], params[:include_diff])
end
end
end
def call(commit_sha, include_diff = false)
Roast::Helpers::Logger.info("π Analyzing commit: #{commit_sha}\n")
# Your implementation here
commit_info = `git show #{commit_sha} --stat`
commit_info += "\n\n" + `git show #{commit_sha}` if include_diff
commit_info
rescue StandardError => e
"Error analyzing commit: #{e.message}".tap do |error_message|
Roast::Helpers::Logger.error(error_message + "\n")
end
end
end
end
end
Then include your tool in the workflow:
tools:
- MyProject::Tools::GitAnalyzer
The tool will be available to the AI model during workflow execution, and it can call analyze_commit
with the appropriate parameters.
Project-specific Configuration
You can extend Roast with project-specific configuration by creating initializers in .roast/initializers/
. These are automatically loaded when workflows run, allowing you to:
- Add custom instrumentation
- Configure monitoring and metrics
- Set up project-specific tools
- Customize workflow behavior
Example structure:
your-project/
βββ .roast/
β βββ initializers/
β βββ metrics.rb
β βββ logging.rb
β βββ custom_tools.rb
βββ ...
Pre/Post Processing Framework
Roast supports pre-processing and post-processing phases for workflows. This enables powerful workflows that need setup/teardown or result aggregation across all processed files.
Overview
- Pre-processing: Steps executed once before any targets are processed
- Post-processing: Steps executed once after all targets have been processed
- Shared state: Pre-processing results are available to all subsequent steps
- Result aggregation: Post-processing has access to all workflow execution results
- Single-target support: Pre/post processing works with single-target workflows too
-
Output templates: Post-processing supports
output.txt
templates for custom formatting
Configuration
name: optimize_tests
model: gpt-4o
target: "test/**/*_test.rb"
# Pre-processing steps run once before any test files
pre_processing:
- gather_baseline_metrics
- setup_test_environment
# Main workflow steps run for each test file
steps:
- analyze_test
- improve_coverage
- optimize_performance
# Post-processing steps run once after all test files
post_processing:
- aggregate_results
- generate_report
- cleanup_environment
Directory Structure
Pre and post-processing steps follow the same conventions as regular steps but are organized in their own directories:
workflow.yml
pre_processing/
βββ gather_baseline_metrics/
β βββ prompt.md
βββ setup_test_environment/
βββ prompt.md
analyze_test/
βββ prompt.md
improve_coverage/
βββ prompt.md
optimize_performance/
βββ prompt.md
post_processing/
βββ output.txt
βββ aggregate_results/
β βββ prompt.md
βββ generate_report/
β βββ prompt.md
βββ cleanup_environment/
βββ prompt.md
Data Access
Pre-processing results in target workflows:
Target workflows have access to pre-processing results through the pre_processing_data
variable with dot notation:
# In a target workflow step prompt
The baseline metrics from pre-processing:
<%= pre_processing_data.gather_baseline_metrics %>
Environment setup details:
<%= pre_processing_data.setup_test_environment %>
Post-processing data access:
Post-processing steps have access to:
-
pre_processing
: Direct access to pre-processing results with dot notation -
targets
: Hash of all target workflow results, keyed by file paths
Example post-processing prompt:
# Generate Summary Report
Based on the baseline metrics:
<%= pre_processing.gather_baseline_metrics %>
Environment configuration:
<%= pre_processing.setup_test_environment %>
And the results from processing all files:
<% targets.each do |file, target| %>
File: <%= file %>
Analysis results: <%= target.output.analyze_test %>
Coverage improvements: <%= target.output.improve_coverage %>
Performance optimizations: <%= target.output.optimize_performance %>
<% end %>
Please generate a comprehensive summary report showing:
1. Overall improvements achieved
2. Files with the most significant changes
3. Recommendations for further optimization
Output Templates
Post-processing supports custom output formatting using ERB templates. Create an output.txt
file in your post_processing
directory to format the final workflow output:
# post_processing/output.txt
=== Workflow Summary Report ===
Generated at: <%= Time.now.strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S") %>
Environment: <%= pre_processing.setup_test_environment %>
Files Processed: <%= targets.size %>
<% targets.each do |file, target| %>
- <%= file %>: <%= target.output.analyze_test %>
<% end %>
<%= output.generate_report %>
===============================
The template has access to:
-
pre_processing
: All pre-processing step outputs with dot notation -
targets
: Hash of all target workflow results with dot notation (each target has.output
and.final_output
) -
output
: Post-processing step outputs with dot notation
Use Cases
This pattern is ideal for:
- Code migrations: Setup migration tools, process files, generate migration report
- Test optimization: Baseline metrics, optimize tests, aggregate improvements
- Documentation generation: Analyze codebase, generate docs per module, create index
- Dependency updates: Check versions, update files, verify compatibility
- Security audits: Setup scanners, check each file, generate security report
- Performance analysis: Establish baselines, analyze components, summarize findings
See the pre/post processing example for a complete working demonstration.
Development
After checking out the repo, run bundle install
to install dependencies. Then, run bundle exec rake
to run the tests and linter. You can also run bin/console
for an interactive prompt that will allow you to experiment.
License
The gem is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.