Project

writ

0.0
No commit activity in last 3 years
No release in over 3 years
Tiny implementation of the command pattern, including input validation, using Scrivener.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
 Dependencies

Development

~> 1.2

Runtime

~> 1.0
 Project Readme

Writ: A minimal command pattern implementation

Build Status RubyGem

writ, noun:
         a form of written command in the name of a court or other legal authority to act, or abstain from acting, in some way.

Writ is a minimal command pattern implementation, including input validation, built on top of Scrivener.

Example

# Define your commands
class LogIn < Writ
  attr_accessor :email
  attr_accessor :password

  def validate
    assert_email :email
    assert_present :password
  end

  def run
    user = User.authenticate(email, password)
    assert user, [:email, :not_valid]
  end
end

# And use them
outcome = LogIn.run(req.params)

if outcome.success?
  session[:user_id] = outcome.value.id
else
  outcome.input.password = nil # Don't leak it when rendering the form again
  render "auth/sign_in", errors: outcome.errors, form: outcome.input
end

Install

gem install writ

Validations

As with scrivener, you should define a validate method that defines all validations for the user input. You're also welcome to use validations inside of run, when an error can come from the process itself. The example above, where the email/password combination yields no user, is a good example. Another example would be having to make an API call that returns an error.

Take a look at the default validations that come from scrivener, or feel free to define custom ones to suit your domain.

Why

When using scrivener, I tend to add a run method to the objects to alter state based on user input alongside the validations. Some people like calling these objects "services", "use cases", "commands", or "interactions".

I find this useful to decouple complex actions from the actors involved in them, and to keep models "thin" by only caring about expressing the domain without burdening themselves with expressing how users can interact with the domain, or with concepts like validation and authorization.

After using this pattern in several production projects, I figured it might as well live in a gem I can reuse instead of copy-pasting code around.

License

This project is shared under the MIT license. See the attached LICENSE file for details.